tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11578122.post1527164586209255952..comments2023-11-02T05:48:48.115-04:00Comments on GayandRight: Climate change on Neptune...GayandRighthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08763498369390166108noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11578122.post-51342818736575345002007-04-21T15:56:00.000-04:002007-04-21T15:56:00.000-04:00I watched a short video on Utube where a Greenpeac...I watched a short video on Utube <BR/>where a Greenpeace vegan tried to argue with a actual Professor that majored in the Sciences of Astronomy and Climate related effects from the Ozone,water,clouds,plants,and CO2 .<BR/><BR/> I had to laugh when the vegan was backed into a corner with Scientific facts about Solar flares and how Earth has been cooling since 1998 which I researched and the Solar cycles confirmed this by weaker flares and a drop from 300+ to 150+ around 1999 , so low and behold the vegan tries to claim the snow in October in Buffalo and recently in many US States is proof of climate change.<BR/><BR/> But that wasn't the debate, it was Global Warming ,stupid .<BR/> Finally the ultimate irony, the Prof. points out the Solar flares are evidence and that almost 40 water-based censors were shut down for good and all new readings are flawed if applied to Computer Models set-up to Forcast weather from Historical data , and the response from Greenpeace was that the Sun creates 300 year cycles and the Science hasn't been around long enough to accurately record Earths weather changes.<BR/><BR/> EXACTLY........so if the Scientists who debate the GHG and Human causes for Global Warming have no credibility simply from flawed historic records, then what evidence does the GHG/G-warming proponents have who rely on the exact Science.<BR/><BR/> Keep in mind folks that Al Gore's movie needing pictures and big coloured charts while he talked slowly to his audience and only used information and experts he agreed with.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com