My name is Fred and I am a gay conservative living in Ottawa. This blog supports limited government, the right of the State of Israel to live in peace and security, and tries to expose the threat to us all from cultural relativism, post-modernism, and radical Islam. I am also the founder of the Free Thinking Film Society in Ottawa (

Sunday, December 18, 2005

An Israeli view of WMD in Iraq...

Virtually every intelligence service said there were WMD and Saddam himself told King Abdullah of Jordon that he has WMD.
And here is what he said about other intelligence services, including those of Israel: "When we made the decision to go into Iraq, many intelligence agencies around the world judged that Saddam possessed weapons of mass destruction." Indeed, many top intelligence and army officials in Israel still insist: "We said this at the time and we were not mistaken. The Americans are the ones who are making the mistake now."

Here is an interesting version that does not worry the public in Israel, in the absence of a public debate over the war in Iraq. These senior officials, who are intimately familiar with Israeli intelligence material, still believe that Iraq really did have weapons of mass destruction. Not nuclear weapons, of course. Israel never made this claim. The Americans indeed erred in inflating the insubstantial information on nuclear plans. But there were chemical and biological weapons. And if the Americans have decided otherwise, especially for political reasons, they are now making a second error on top of the first error.

Some of these officials have shared their views with their American contacts. "Why didn't we find the weaponry?" the Americans asked. The Israelis told them politely: because most of it was transferred to Syria before the war. Such suspicions have been openly published. All the intelligence services in the West are familiar with photographs of trucks sneaking across the border at night, accompanied by senior Iraqi officers. The problem is that the moment Israel turns an accusatory finger toward Syria, it is immediately suspected of ulterior, political motives. "They can think whatever they want," an Israeli officer says. "Perhaps it is impossible to change their opinion, but it is also impossible to change the truth. Material was transferred to Syria in the dark of the night, on the very eve of the war. Therefore, the Americans did not find it." And this, as suggested above, is the more polite explanation.

The other explanation is expressed in more intimate circles in order to avoid irritating the American friend. But in the course of two weeks, I heard it from three different Israelis who were in positions that had access to intelligence during the war. Some of them are still serving in such positions. "They simply don't know how to search properly," said one. "Do you know how they searched? The forces were sent to a certain location and went into the field without a serious intelligence escort. If there was nothing found under the rock at this location, they simply went home, without bothering to turn over the adjacent rock," another said.


Anonymous Anonymous said...

A friend of mine over coffee once made an interesting proposition just for the sake of arguement. He said if he were a dictator of a third world country that had enemies on it's borders, he wouldn't bother going to the trouble of developing nuclear weapons. He would just make everyone BELIEVE he had them. An underground "nuke" test that was actually a large conventional explosion. Fake telephone calls & coded radio messages that he knew his enemies would intercept & decode. All these things would convince his enemies that he actually HAD nuclear weapons when in fact he never had them at all. He could have the safety of a "nuclear umbrella" without the difficulty of actually developing the devices. I believe Saddam was trying something similar.

12:47 AM  
Blogger Feynman and Coulter's Love Child said...

The problem with the "no WMDs" view is that is still doesn't explain where all the missing chemicals went. The weapons inspectors had a list assembled by the United Nations. They knew how much sarin Iraq had, how much fissionable material Iraq had, and the like. There was a sizeable list of raw materials that could be used for benign purposes or for biological or chemical weapons. A large part of the goal of U.N. weapons inspectors was to obtain proof that the existing delivery systems and stockpiles had been destroyed, and that all the material had been accounted for. When Clinton began his air strikes policy it was because the U.N. inspectors reported they were unable to locate all the material, and Saddam kept barring them from "sensitive areas".

So go figure the Israelis, who have excellent intelligence and aren't easily duped into forgetting recent history confirm that these weapons exist and have merely been moved. And even if they aren't in Syria or Iran or Saudi Arabia, remember that fighter jets were buried in the sand and hidden from the Americans for 4 months or so. If they could hide freaking airplanes, they could hide some storage tanks.

5:24 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The whole topic is moot.
To find out why the USA is in Iraq just go to:
Be sure to check out the dates of the articles you'll be reading.

4:43 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home