What's wrong with the IPCC???
Here's a good handy guide on the IPCC...
- The hypothesis that an increased CO2 concentration in the atmosphere will lead to a rise in temperature has not been proven and is even at odds with the observations.
- Satellite-based temperature measurements show that the earth has warmed a few tenths of a degree Celsius between 1979 and 1998. It is not likely that this is caused by mankind.
- There is still a lack of scientific understanding, required to model all assumed radia¬tive forcings. The most important one, for which there are not sufficient quantitative data to date, is the variable impact of clouds.
- Climate models, which are being used to achieve a better understanding of the climate system, are not suited to serve as basis for predictions. This is, inter alia, related to the stochastic nature of climate.
- The global climate is very much determined by extra-terrestrial phenomena, of which the fluctuation of sun activity is the most important.
- Should there still be global warming in the future, for which there are only model-based indications, then mankind will not be able to do something about it. Moreover, also according the IPCC, a modest additional warming (e.g., of 2 degrees Celsius) will on balance be beneficial for mankind.
- The IPCC has ignored the climate projections of astrophysicists, which suggest global cooling.
1 Comments:
There is more on what is wrong with the IPCC in David Holland's new paper available at http://homepages.tesco.net/~kate-and-david/2007/Holland(2007).pdf It follows the saga of Mann, Bradley and Hughes' famous hockey stick graph and then shows how objections were disregarded in the latest IPCC report.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home