GayandRight

My name is Fred and I am a gay conservative living in Ottawa. This blog supports limited government, the right of the State of Israel to live in peace and security, and tries to expose the threat to us all from cultural relativism, post-modernism, and radical Islam. I am also the founder of the Free Thinking Film Society in Ottawa (www.freethinkingfilms.com)

Saturday, March 15, 2008

Does carbon capture and storage work???

Patrick Moore, ex-founder of Greenpeace, says no...and that requiring it will just push producers to nuclear...
Carbon capture and storage (CCS), which coal-miners worldwide hope will guarantee a future for coal as an energy source, may not be viable, technically, economically, and in terms of liability.

This is the view of Canadian scientist, environmentalist, and a former director of Greenpeace International, Dr Patrick Moore.

“It’s a huge technical problem. It’s massive volumes we’re talking about here – millions of tons of gas. All the feasible approaches that I have seen would end up using a very large portion of the energy from the power plant just to do the sequestration,” he says.

Once the carbon dioxide has been captured, it must be sequestrated. This involves transporting it, whether in gaseous, liquid, or supercritical form, by pipeline and/or road tanker and/or ship, through storage sites, to the sequestration location. The catch is that this sequestration has to endure for a very long time indeed – at least centuries, if not millennia. In theory – and, currently, in limited practice – the carbon dioxide can be injected into permeable geological formations, surrounded by impermeable rocks, such as deep saline formations, exhausted oil and gas reservoirs, unminable coal seams, and even abandoned coal mines.

“I do not believe that it is economically or technically feasible, compared to other technologies,” affirms Moore. “In other words, if the coal-fired power industry was required to sequester its carbon, I think they would stop building coal plants and build nuclear plants instead, where you don’t have this problem.” Moore is a strong supporter of nuclear power and hydroelectric power as the most environment-friendly options for baseline power generation.

3 Comments:

Blogger Mark Francis said...

Moore was not a founder of Greenpeace. He was there when it happened, but that's it.

He is a paid PR hack for the nuclear industry.

Previously, he was a paid PR hack for, BC's forestry industry, advocating clear-cutting old growth forests.

5:43 PM  
Blogger Tomm said...

Mark,

Patrick Moore was one of two co-founders of Greenpeace.

Whoever is re-writing history over at GreenpeaceHistory.com should probably quit taking direction from the Nazi's or Orwell's Big Brother because it just makes them and their supporters look ugly and dagnerous.... wait a minute!

Tomm

7:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

'carbon capture' etc... what silly ideas these people come up with.

3:34 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home