Don't believe the IPCC on Sea Level Rises...
Some interesting observations regarding their data...
The IPCC falsified data showing a sea level rise from 1992-2002 according to Dr. Nils-Axel Morner, former head of the Paleogeophysics and Geodynamics department at Stockholm University in Sweden. In an interview by George Murphy, Morner cites various examples of falsification of evidence claiming sea level rises.
"Then, in 2003, the same data set, which in their [IPCC's] publications, in their website, was a straight line - suddenly it changed, and showed a very strong line of uplift, 2.3 mm per year, the same as from the tide gauge. And that didn't look so nice. It looked as though they had recorded something; but they hadn't recorded anything. It was the original one which they had suddenly twisted up, because they entered a 'correction factor,' which they took from the tide gauge" in an area of Hong Kong that had been subsiding, or sinking.
Morner says that the claim that salt water invasion of a fresh water aquifer indicated a sea level rise ignores the more likely cause due to draining the aquifer for the pineapple industry.
Sea level in the Maldives actually fell during the 70's according to Morner, but the area is cited as evidence of a sea level rise. He accuses Australian global warming advocates of knocking down a tree on one island to attempt to prove sea levels were rising.
Morner is particularly critical of the overemphasis on computer modeling by IPCC "experts" instead of doing actual field research like geologists do.
" Again, it was a computer issue. This is the typical thing: The meteorological community works with computers, simple computers. Geologists don't do that! We go out in the field and observe, and then we can try to make a model with computerization; but it's not the first thing."
1 Comments:
Great post.
The only people who make global warming an issue are the left wing loons.
This has become a left vs. right ideology.
Period.
ANYONE WHO STUDIES THE ISSUE KNOWS THAT THE IPCC HAS LIED NUMEROUS TIMES ABOUT IT "FACTS" AND THAT THEY USE COMPUTER MODELS INSTEAD OF REAL WORLD OBSERVATIONS.
It's time Harper held committee meetings like the British did to scrutinize the IPCC and the logic it uses.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home